Loading…
This online program is updated daily. Delegates can also check the Program Change board beside the Registration Desk at MCEC for notices of program changes.

Wednesday, September 9 • 14:30 - 15:00
Reaching across disciplinary boundaries: Seeing evaluation through a positive psychology lens

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule, view media, leave feedback and see who's attending!

Kathryn Cairns (Centre for Program Evaluation), Janet Clinton (Centre for Program Evaluation), Lea Waters (Centre for Positive Psychology)

This paper will discuss the synergies between the philosophy, methods, and practice of evaluation and positive psychology. Evaluation has much to offer across the disciplines in supporting judgments of the merit, worth and significance, and has emerged as a transdiscipline, or the "Alpha Discipline" as Scriven (2004) contends. As evaluation moves into this new sphere, however, defining its boundaries, its foundation and its very system presents a challenge. Finding evaluation's foundation in existing paradigms may offer some calm in this storm. 

One such discipline is positive psychology. The discipline of positive psychology is a relatively young field, emerging in its contemporary form in the late 1990s when Martin Seligman advocated for a strengths-based approach to psychology. It delineates core virtues such as wisdom and knowledge, courage and justice (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) which have clear parallels with the Program Evaluation Standards (Yarbrough, Schulha, Hopson, and Caruthers, 2011). At the nexus of these fields is a guiding purpose of social betterment. 

Drawing on evaluation case studies, we will highlight the principles, methods and practices that positive psychology can bring to the practice of evaluation, to support collaborative evaluation practice. Program evaluation, like any deliberate inquiry process, is about learning. Over the past decade, the methods and frameworks for evaluation have evolved to emphasise collaborative processes, which involves corralling the voice of many stakeholders, distributing information widely, making systems visible and increasing organisational rigour. The principles of positive psychology can provide a framework for effective practice to support the achievement of these varied tasks.

Utilising  case examples, we will argue that evaluation and positive psychology have much to offer one another. The foundation of positive psychology may offer the new generation of evaluators an architecture within which to work, whilst the theories and methodologies of evaluation can support the young field of positive psychology to demonstrate its contributions in a rigorous and value-laden manner.

Session Chair
avatar for Graeme Nicholas

Graeme Nicholas

Senior Scientist: Service Innovation, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited
I am a social systems researcher with particular interests in social complexity, policy development and developmental evaluation. I am part of the Social Systems team at ESR. ESR is a NZ Crown Research Institute that focuses on science for the health and justice sectors. My background... Read More →

Speakers
avatar for Kathryn Cairns

Kathryn Cairns

Centre for Program Evaluation
Kathryn in a doctoral candidate at the University of Melbourne in the School of Population and Global Health and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Program Evaluation. Her PhD focuses on identifying key universal prevention messages for adolescents, to reduce their risk of depression... Read More →
avatar for Janet Clinton

Janet Clinton

Professor, University of Melbourne
Professor Janet Clinton is Director of the Centre for Program Evaluation (‘CPE’) at the Melbourne Graduate School of Education (‘MGSE’). She was previously the senior academic in Program Evaluation and the Academic Director for the School of Population Health at the University... Read More →


Wednesday September 9, 2015 14:30 - 15:00 AEST
Room 111 MCEC

Attendees (0)